Skip to content
Friday, October 9, 2026
Smart Space Zone

Tetris Didn't Win at The Game Awards — A New Category May Address This Issue

Each time a prominent honors show draws close, one notices an outcry to include of new categories to recognize unsung work and satisfy the spirits of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

A fellow writer has already made advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are tabletop games, representing someone's personal cause. Yet I need to apologize in advance when I prioritize because like all single-minded supporters, there's a strong justification backing this proposal remains most pressing above others. Here's the proposal: There should be a category for puzzle games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably start arguments and end in fuzzy definitions. It's understandable that movie academies steer clear of genre categories. But it is a necessary evil for the industry of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.

For the full spectrum of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, and for games of all stripes to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these classifications actually cover a lot of ground, allowing placement for numerous titles.

Different situation exists for puzzle games. No suitable classification appears to accommodate them. Think about these this year’s best games, each quite distinct: the architectural riddles from a specific release, fast-paced pattern recognition from another release, engaging interpersonal challenges in another game. Where could they possibly go between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens excellent brain-teasers released every year without proper recognition during gaming ceremonies, if they accidentally match for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging Indie races.

  • A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated for anything during that awards season
  • A different innovative game received no nominations that year
  • Well-received sorting experience was overlooked that year
  • Only a few logic titles scraped into independent or mobile categories

Importance of Logic Titles

These are often compact experiences, however the design of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games rank among most popular titles in the world and have been for many years.

The legendary block-stacking game challenges well-known building titles claiming status as most purchased experience; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, and engaging with almost every other genre.

The Solution and Justification

Logic titles wouldn't face such difficulty. It would be easy to populate five nominees engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, since numerous excellent many worthy titles.

To emphasize again, these include experiences without proper classification during prominent ceremonies. Brain-teaser creators function at the demanding boundary interactive creation, creating some of most fundamental forms of the video game form. Just like movie stunt professionals, they merit acknowledgment. Let’s not keep them waiting generations.

The writer

Brenda Calhoun

Liam Verstraeten is a tech enthusiast and freelance writer who explores the intersection of technology and everyday life.

Smart Space Zone

Type to search articles.